| Model | AMB-TH2080 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 250x250 mm 9.84×9.84 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 1 x 55 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 25 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 137 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 10 (69 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 11 (78 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 4 (28 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 72 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 91 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 160 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2128 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 795x1925 x600 mm 31.30×48.23 ×23.62 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 725x1450 mm 28.54×57.09 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x Lx H) | 4550x5800 x3000 mm 179.13×228.35 ×118.11 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 25 |
| Model | AMB-TH2210 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 300x300 mm 11.81×11.81 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 1 x 55 1 x 90 2 x 55 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 34-23 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 101-149 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 13-19 (124 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 15-22 (141 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 5-7 (44 kg) |
| Cylinder forces,1st compactor (t) | 112 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 136 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 200 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2063 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 1020x2235 x800 mm 47.64×88.39 ×31.50 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 945x1655 mm 37.20×65.16 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x Lx H) | 5290x6605 x3735 mm 208.27×260.04 ×148.62 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 41 |
| Model | AMB-TH2212 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 300x300 mm 11.81×11.81 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 1 x 55 1 x 90 2 x 55 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 38-26 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 90-132 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 12-17 (124 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 13-20 (141 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 4-6 (44 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 112 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 161 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 200 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2063 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 1245x2235 x800 mm 49.02×88.39 ×31.50 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 1170x1655 mm 46.06×65.16 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x Lx H) | 5990x6605 x3775 mm 235.83×260.04 ×148.62 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 44 |
| Model | AMB-TH2812 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 400x400 mm 15.75×15.75 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 1 x 90 2 x 55 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 40-36 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 86-95 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 24-26 (264 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 27-30 (301 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 8-9 (94 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 161 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 220 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 350 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2104 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 1245x2840 x1100 mm 49.02×95.98 ×43.31 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 1170x2130 mm 46.06×83.86 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x L x H) | 6360x8035 x4600 mm 250.39×316.34 ×181.10 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 60 |
| Model | AMB-TH2815 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 400x400 mm 15.75×15.75 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 1 x 90 2 x 90 3 x 90 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 46-28 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 74-122 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 21-34 (264 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 23-39 (301 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 7-12 (94 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 189 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 252 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 350 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2104 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 1500x2840 x1100 mm 59.06×95.98 ×43.31 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 1425x2130 mm 56.10×83.86 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x L x H) | 7060x8035 x4615 mm 277.95×316.34 ×181.69 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 67 |
| Model | AMB-TH6020 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 600x600 mm 23.62×23.62 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 3 x 90 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 60 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 57 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 47 (791 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 54 (903 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 16 (272 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 343 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 494 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 800 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2144 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 2000x6000 x1600 mm 78.74×236.22 ×62.99 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 2910x4930 mm 114.57×194.09 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x L x H) | 10155x15650 x6110 mm 400.00×616.14 ×240.55 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 186 |
| Model | AMB-TH60201 |
| Bales HxW (L) | 600x600 mm 23.62×23.62 in |
| Motor Power (kw) | 3 x 90 |
| Cycle time (no-load) (s) | 69 |
| Bales/h (90% availability) | 50 |
| Max. production capacity, Fe (bale weight) (t/h) | 59 (1130 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Cu + Ms (bale weight) (t/h) | 67 (1290 kg) |
| Max. production capacity, Al (bale weight) (t/h) | 20 (389 kg) |
| Cylinder forces, 1st compactor (t) | 343 |
| Cylinder forces, 2nd compactor (t) | 494 |
| Cylinder forces, final compactor (t) | 1000 |
| Spec. pressure final compactor (N/ cm²) | 2749 |
| Press box, (W x L x H) | 2010x6000 x1600 mm 82.68×236.22 ×62.99 in |
| Feed opening, (W x L) | 1910x4930 mm 75.20×194.09 in |
| Machine dimensions (W x L x H) | 10495x15650 x6110 mm 413.19×616.14 ×240.55 in |
| Machine weight (t) | approx. 201 |
A recycling company in Boise, Idaho, has completed the installation of an ENERPAT AMB-L2014-250 metal hydraulic baler for processing discarded mattress springs and other metal scrap. The project was driven by a straightforward operational need: loose mattress springs take up considerable space before they are shipped or moved for further recycling. By compacting the material into dense bales, the recycler can make better use of its yard space and handle the recovered metal more efficiently. For this application, the AMB-L2014-250 Sheet Metal Baler was selected as a practical fit, with an expected processing capacity of approximately 4–5 tons per hour for mattress springs.
When your existing equipment starts limiting your efficiency, upgrading is no longer optional—it becomes necessary. This Thailand-based recycling company had been working with ENERPAT for years. After previously investing in a Two Shaft Shredder, their operations expanded steadily. However, as their processing volume increased, their aging baler began to struggle with performance, maintenance issues, and inconsistent output. Handling stainless steel scrap—especially loose, irregular materials—requires consistent compression performance. The customer needed a more reliable scrap stainless steel baler to maintain productivity and reduce downtime.
❓ Why Is a Scrap Metal Baler for Mattress Springs Essential in Austin?With the rapid growth of mattress recycling businesses across the U.S., especially in cities like Austin, handling bulky and high-tensile mattress springs has become a critical operational challenge.For local recyclers, investing
A Reliable Metal Chip Baler Solution for Industrial Scrap Management in OhioIn Crestline, Ohio, a comprehensive waste management and environmental services provider recently completed the installation of an ENERPAT AMB-L2014-250 Metal Chip Baler, marking a successful collaboration driven by urgency,
As New Zealand continues to strengthen its circular economy and metal recycling infrastructure, demand for reliable and high-performance baling equipment is rising steadily.Recently, ENERPAT successfully completed the installation of a Non Ferrous Baler for Sale for a large integrated metal recyclin
As Nigeria's recycling industry continues to evolve, more local scrap processors are seeking reliable and heavy-duty solutions to improve operational efficiency. Recently, ENERPAT successfully installed a Scrap Metal Baler Machine for a professional metal recycling company in Nigeria, helping the cu
As one of Central Europe’s fastest-growing recycling markets, Poland continues to invest heavily in efficient scrap metal processing equipment. Recently, an experienced Polish metal recycling company successfully upgraded its operation with an ENERPAT Baling Scrap Metal Machine, solving long-standin
As the recycling industry in the Caribbean continues to modernize, metal recyclers in the Dominican Republic are facing increasing pressure to improve efficiency, safety, and operating stability. Recently, ENERPAT successfully installed a Door Cover Ferrous Baler for a professional metal recycling c
In South Africa’s fast-growing scrap recycling market, efficiency, reliability, and safety are no longer optional — they are essential. Recently, ENERPAT successfully installed a Hydraulic Metal Baler for a South African recycling company specializing in the trading and processing of recyclable mate
As Mexico’s recycling industry continues to expand, small and medium-sized recycling companies are under growing pressure to process mixed scrap materials more efficiently, safely, and profitably. In 2024, ENERPAT successfully installed a Metal Scrap Press Machine for a Mexican recycling trader, hel
As Chile accelerates its transition toward a circular economy, metal recyclers are under increasing pressure to process higher volumes of scrap iron efficiently while reducing logistics and storage costs. In this context, ENERPAT successfully installed a Scrap Iron Baler for Metals for a long-establ
Project Background: A Brazilian Scrap Yard Under Pressure to Grow EfficientlyA long-established scrap metal recycling center in Brazil was facing a challenge familiar to many operators across Latin America. Daily operations generated large volumes of irregular iron scrap—mixed sizes, inconsistent sh
Helping an Argentine Cable Manufacturer Turn Copper Scrap into ValueIn Argentina's metal manufacturing sector, copper and aluminum prices fluctuate frequently, while storage space and logistics costs continue to rise. For cable and conductor manufacturers, handling large volumes of loose copper wire
Turning Irregular Scrap into Profitable Bales: A Successful U.S. Recycling CaseIn the United States, scrap metal recyclers face a constant challenge: large volumes of irregular, bulky metal scrap driving up storage, transportation, and handling costs. This case study highlights how a professional U.
Turning Scrap Tin into Value: A Real Recycling Success Story from GreeceAs Greece continues to strengthen its circular economy framework, manufacturers are under growing pressure to manage scrap metal more efficiently. In this context, Scrap Tin Baler solutions have become a critical investment for
From Google Search to On-Site Success: An Ecuador Scrap Recycling Case StudyWhen an Ecuadorian scrap metal recycler searched Google for “Iron Scrap Baler”, they were facing a common but urgent challenge in the local recycling market: large volumes of mixed-size iron scrap that were costly and ineffi
Australia's recycling industry is experiencing a strong shift toward localized metal processing, efficient downstream logistics, and higher-value resource recovery. This trend recently brought an Australian metal recycler to ENERPAT after searching for a “Mattress Springs Scrap Bundling Machine”—a v